Judge Blocks Trump Order on Citizenship Proof for Voter Forms

Trump Administration Restores Millions to Cornell University After Probe

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked enforcement of an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that sought to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship on the federal voter-registration form.

Federal judge rules Trump can't require citizenship proof on federal voting  form | CNN Politics

The Ruling

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly held that the Constitution assigns authority over federal election regulation to Congress and the states — not to the president acting alone. “Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes,” she wrote. The ruling permanently bars the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from implementing the citizenship‐proof mandate.

Trump formally appeals his New York hush money conviction - ABC News

Background

In March 2025, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at overhauling federal election procedures. Among other provisions, the order directed that anyone registering to vote using the federal form must provide government-issued proof of citizenship. The order also linked federal election funding to state compliance with these reforms and required information-sharing agreements between federal and state election officials.

Donald Trump: Presidency, Family, Education | HISTORY

Legal Implications

The decision is a major legal setback for the administration’s election-integrity initiative. Civil-rights groups including the Democratic National Committee, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and the League of Women Voters Education Fund brought suit, arguing the directive violated the separation of powers and would disenfranchise lawful voters.

What Comes Next

While the citizenship-proof requirement is blocked, other elements of the executive order remain under legal review. The case will continue as the court examines whether other directives within the order are lawful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *